Skip to main content
guest
Join
|
Help
|
Sign In
SustainabilityProblems
Home
guest
|
Join
|
Help
|
Sign In
Wiki Home
Recent Changes
Pages and Files
Members
home
syllabus
schedule
films
debates
help desk
templates
EXAM (fall 2014)
Don't Worry wiki post evaluation
Edit
0
1
…
0
Tags
No tags
Notify
RSS
Backlinks
Source
Print
Export (PDF)
"Don't Worry?" Wiki Post Evaluation
1. Is the collage striking, unpredictable and memorable?
2. Does the collage have a caption that explains it, briefly articulating the main point of the presentation?
3. Does the text effectively convey the significance of the problem focused on, and how it indexes a need to worry about environmental sustainability?
4. Does the text provide compelling supporting detail – on the magnitude of the problem, on stakeholders, etc.?
5. Does the text indicate the consequences of not addressing the problem focused on?
6. Does the text or supporting links suggest how the problem could be fixed?
7. Does the presentation demonstrate in-depth engagement with its (at least one) academic references -- beyond the abstracts?
8. Do (at least three) supporting links provide additional, useful information on the problem?
9. Is the on-line presentation effectively organized?
10. Are there appropriate citations throughout, for images as well as for information and quotations in the text?
Javascript Required
You need to enable Javascript in your browser to edit pages.
help on how to format text
Turn off "Getting Started"
Home
...
Loading...
"Don't Worry?" Wiki Post Evaluation
1. Is the collage striking, unpredictable and memorable?
2. Does the collage have a caption that explains it, briefly articulating the main point of the presentation?
3. Does the text effectively convey the significance of the problem focused on, and how it indexes a need to worry about environmental sustainability?
4. Does the text provide compelling supporting detail – on the magnitude of the problem, on stakeholders, etc.?
5. Does the text indicate the consequences of not addressing the problem focused on?
6. Does the text or supporting links suggest how the problem could be fixed?
7. Does the presentation demonstrate in-depth engagement with its (at least one) academic references -- beyond the abstracts?
8. Do (at least three) supporting links provide additional, useful information on the problem?
9. Is the on-line presentation effectively organized?
10. Are there appropriate citations throughout, for images as well as for information and quotations in the text?